<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Libel on the Internet under Philippine Law Part II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thewarriorlawyer.com/2007/03/04/libel-on-the-internet-under-philippine-law-part-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thewarriorlawyer.com/2007/03/04/libel-on-the-internet-under-philippine-law-part-ii/</link>
	<description>Lawyer in the Philippines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 19:14:53 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://thewarriorlawyer.com/2007/03/04/libel-on-the-internet-under-philippine-law-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-85252</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewarriorlawyer.com/2007/03/04/libel-on-the-internet-under-philippine-law-part-ii/#comment-85252</guid>
		<description>The Supreme Court better come up with an updated law regarding libel. The internet is a way, much worse, to publicly insult a person. I mean seriously what is taking them so long, are they going to wait until someone commits libel against the Supreme Court through the internet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court better come up with an updated law regarding libel. The internet is a way, much worse, to publicly insult a person. I mean seriously what is taking them so long, are they going to wait until someone commits libel against the Supreme Court through the internet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: allan lim</title>
		<link>http://thewarriorlawyer.com/2007/03/04/libel-on-the-internet-under-philippine-law-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-82203</link>
		<dc:creator>allan lim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 15:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewarriorlawyer.com/2007/03/04/libel-on-the-internet-under-philippine-law-part-ii/#comment-82203</guid>
		<description>hi i have been battling this ex-friend of mine who has been spreading rumors about me on facebook? is there a way to atleast stop him from going further with this... please help me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi i have been battling this ex-friend of mine who has been spreading rumors about me on facebook? is there a way to atleast stop him from going further with this&#8230; please help me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aireen</title>
		<link>http://thewarriorlawyer.com/2007/03/04/libel-on-the-internet-under-philippine-law-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-76381</link>
		<dc:creator>aireen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 06:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewarriorlawyer.com/2007/03/04/libel-on-the-internet-under-philippine-law-part-ii/#comment-76381</guid>
		<description>please advise me my bf sis is sending me an email stating that i am a whore.
can i file case against her.what kind of case.
thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>please advise me my bf sis is sending me an email stating that i am a whore.<br />
can i file case against her.what kind of case.<br />
thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheryll Jane Lumandaz Viernes</title>
		<link>http://thewarriorlawyer.com/2007/03/04/libel-on-the-internet-under-philippine-law-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-73525</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheryll Jane Lumandaz Viernes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewarriorlawyer.com/2007/03/04/libel-on-the-internet-under-philippine-law-part-ii/#comment-73525</guid>
		<description>I need an advise, because I wanted to file a suit in philippines/Thailand  for a libel case.(Libel on the Internet)I need a lawyer that is speedy and dependable. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I need an advise, because I wanted to file a suit in philippines/Thailand  for a libel case.(Libel on the Internet)I need a lawyer that is speedy and dependable. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlisse</title>
		<link>http://thewarriorlawyer.com/2007/03/04/libel-on-the-internet-under-philippine-law-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-65402</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlisse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewarriorlawyer.com/2007/03/04/libel-on-the-internet-under-philippine-law-part-ii/#comment-65402</guid>
		<description>Need advise, im considering  filing a suit in Marikina City for a libel case.. Contact me. Need a lawyer that is speedy and dependable. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Need advise, im considering  filing a suit in Marikina City for a libel case.. Contact me. Need a lawyer that is speedy and dependable. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://thewarriorlawyer.com/2007/03/04/libel-on-the-internet-under-philippine-law-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-62782</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 05:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewarriorlawyer.com/2007/03/04/libel-on-the-internet-under-philippine-law-part-ii/#comment-62782</guid>
		<description>It is not yet very clear if the writing libelous article online is similar to the other means of publication enumerated in art. 355 of the RPC (i.e.,  writing, printing, lithography, engraving, radio, phonograph, painting, theatrical
exhibition, cinematographic exhibition, or &quot;any similar means&quot;). The DOJ has dismissed a libel case based on an online article saying that the online publication does not fall under the enumeration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not yet very clear if the writing libelous article online is similar to the other means of publication enumerated in art. 355 of the RPC (i.e.,  writing, printing, lithography, engraving, radio, phonograph, painting, theatrical<br />
exhibition, cinematographic exhibition, or &#8220;any similar means&#8221;). The DOJ has dismissed a libel case based on an online article saying that the online publication does not fall under the enumeration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tara</title>
		<link>http://thewarriorlawyer.com/2007/03/04/libel-on-the-internet-under-philippine-law-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-47472</link>
		<dc:creator>Tara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 07:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewarriorlawyer.com/2007/03/04/libel-on-the-internet-under-philippine-law-part-ii/#comment-47472</guid>
		<description>While libel on the internet is punishable under the Philippine Laws, difficulty arises in proving the author. 

How do I prove by DIRECT evidence, that the accused is the author of the libelous material? Would the service provider, who is usually loacated overseas, provide the details of the person/account? 

Like for example, &quot;A&quot; wrote a shout out  in friendster saying that &quot;B&quot; is a whore and family wrecker. The shout out was seen by the friends of &quot;B&quot; so &quot;B&quot; sued &quot;A&quot; for libel.  The defense of &quot;A&quot; was that she does not own the account.  Considering that &quot;B&quot; has to prove beyond reasonable doubt the guilt of &quot;A&quot;, what evidence could &quot;B&quot; offer that would satisfy the court that it was indeed &quot;A&quot; who posted the shout out?


Would friendster reveal the true identity of &quot;A&quot;? 

Assuming that friendster revealed the identity of &quot;A&quot; and then it was found that as per log in entries, it was &quot;A&quot; who owns the account since the age, location, personal details as registered when the account was created was &quot;A&#039;s&quot;, but the truth is that the account was not really &quot;A&#039;s&quot; but some other person, how now would &quot;A&quot; prove that the account was not hers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While libel on the internet is punishable under the Philippine Laws, difficulty arises in proving the author. </p>
<p>How do I prove by DIRECT evidence, that the accused is the author of the libelous material? Would the service provider, who is usually loacated overseas, provide the details of the person/account? </p>
<p>Like for example, &#8220;A&#8221; wrote a shout out  in friendster saying that &#8220;B&#8221; is a whore and family wrecker. The shout out was seen by the friends of &#8220;B&#8221; so &#8220;B&#8221; sued &#8220;A&#8221; for libel.  The defense of &#8220;A&#8221; was that she does not own the account.  Considering that &#8220;B&#8221; has to prove beyond reasonable doubt the guilt of &#8220;A&#8221;, what evidence could &#8220;B&#8221; offer that would satisfy the court that it was indeed &#8220;A&#8221; who posted the shout out?</p>
<p>Would friendster reveal the true identity of &#8220;A&#8221;? </p>
<p>Assuming that friendster revealed the identity of &#8220;A&#8221; and then it was found that as per log in entries, it was &#8220;A&#8221; who owns the account since the age, location, personal details as registered when the account was created was &#8220;A&#8217;s&#8221;, but the truth is that the account was not really &#8220;A&#8217;s&#8221; but some other person, how now would &#8220;A&#8221; prove that the account was not hers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sunshine</title>
		<link>http://thewarriorlawyer.com/2007/03/04/libel-on-the-internet-under-philippine-law-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-34725</link>
		<dc:creator>sunshine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thewarriorlawyer.com/2007/03/04/libel-on-the-internet-under-philippine-law-part-ii/#comment-34725</guid>
		<description>where do i ask legal help regarding libel by email... i dont have money.. would this still be possible?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where do i ask legal help regarding libel by email&#8230; i dont have money.. would this still be possible?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

