Comments on: Lorenzo “Jun” Lozada and the Year of the Rat http://thewarriorlawyer.com/2008/02/09/lorenzo-%e2%80%9cjun%e2%80%9d-lozada-and-the-year-of-the-rat/ Lawyer in the Philippines Sat, 13 Feb 2010 05:36:50 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Art Magno http://thewarriorlawyer.com/2008/02/09/lorenzo-%e2%80%9cjun%e2%80%9d-lozada-and-the-year-of-the-rat/comment-page-1/#comment-21448 Art Magno Sat, 01 Mar 2008 04:52:57 +0000 http://thewarriorlawyer.com/2008/02/09/lorenzo-%e2%80%9cjun%e2%80%9d-lozada-and-the-year-of-the-rat/#comment-21448 I recently came across the website below regarding Mr. Jun Lozada and I thought I should share it with you: patriots4truth.blogspot.com It might help us arrive at a clearer discernment of the truth about the ZTE controversy. I recently came across the website below regarding Mr. Jun Lozada and I thought I should share it with you:

patriots4truth.blogspot.com

It might help us arrive at a clearer discernment of the truth about the ZTE controversy.

]]> By: Man of the Hour http://thewarriorlawyer.com/2008/02/09/lorenzo-%e2%80%9cjun%e2%80%9d-lozada-and-the-year-of-the-rat/comment-page-1/#comment-20013 Man of the Hour Mon, 11 Feb 2008 02:21:08 +0000 http://thewarriorlawyer.com/2008/02/09/lorenzo-%e2%80%9cjun%e2%80%9d-lozada-and-the-year-of-the-rat/#comment-20013 [...] The Warrior Lawyer condemned Mr. Lozada as a “pious fraud,” but then again, rare is the instance when a court can obtain the cooperation of a lily-white witness. Notwithstanding this snide remark, he - and I by the way - agreed that Mr. Lozada was a credible witness nonetheless, as he readily uttered many statements prejudicial to his own self-interest, such as admitting to committing numerous corrupt practices while in office. Mr. Lozada could have taken the Fifth but didn’t, oddly enough. [...] [...] The Warrior Lawyer condemned Mr. Lozada as a “pious fraud,” but then again, rare is the instance when a court can obtain the cooperation of a lily-white witness. Notwithstanding this snide remark, he – and I by the way – agreed that Mr. Lozada was a credible witness nonetheless, as he readily uttered many statements prejudicial to his own self-interest, such as admitting to committing numerous corrupt practices while in office. Mr. Lozada could have taken the Fifth but didn’t, oddly enough. [...]

]]>